If you have no bone within a finger or arm but you have muscle, would you be capable of move it?

If you have no bone within a finger or arm but you have muscle, would you be capable of move it?
No you wouldn't be able top because the bone is the one that allows you to move. The muscle in opposition is more so like the protection of the bone and plus the bone is complicated and can be bent like it is the muscle is flabby and almost close to the first layer of skin.
I devise that maybe you could sort of wave to and fro it, but since your muscles and tendons use your bones as a base, they hold nothing but other blobby muscles to push against.
Have you read the Harry Potter books? HIs armbone disappears at one point, and his arm "flapped pointlessly." I swear, it's one of my favorite lines ever...
no, because the muscle wishes something to pull on to move an appendage. you'd freshly have something resembling a rubber finger/arm/whatever
That's a good cross-question.
I assume it would be the same as your tongue, which is a muscle beside only one attachment.
If you devise really hard, you'll know how to answer that question.
yes.
Worms don't own any bones, but they do have muscles.
Nope. You might know how to make it twitch a bit, since the muscles could still contract, but you would be incompetent to actually move the boneless feeler.
In order to move near any degree of control over your body you want bones to support your tissues and provide a base for your muscles to verbs on.